Saturday, May 9, 2009

theosophy isn't political & isn't pushing the new world order?

theosophy isn't political & isn't forwarding the new world order.

it seems blavatsky herself desired international socialism as the playing field for her "brotherhood of man".

of course you realize the idea of "the brotherhood of man" is not peculiar to theosophy. it is also a staple of the new age brainwash you'll find in the new age psiop "a course in miracles", & freemasonry. are you going to tell me now that freemasonry is another innocent bystander in the push for a new world order?









do you realize how entangled & unified theosophy & freemasonry have become in this regard?


it seems blavatsky influenced the nazis in more ways than one.

the Nazis always referred to themselves as 'National Socialists' and never as "Nazis" and they always used the word "hakenkreuz" instead of "swastika."



Bejamin Creme writes:
"The externalization of the Hierarchy actually started as far back as 1860. Certain disciples came in, such as H.P. Blavatsky and others, who have been releasing to the world the New Age teachings. I don’t mean just the occult teaching. I mean new ideas of philosophy, of politics, of economics, etc. "
(Frequently Asked Questions, version 9 April 2000, website Indo-Paksitani Maitreya Share International)


"Caligula wished that the Roman people had but one neck that he might cut it off...I was capable of wishing the same thing concerning the laboring classes of America." -- Edward Bellamy

"In 1888, Blavatsky and TS teamed up with Nationalist Clubs and the Nationalism movement under the notorious socialist Edward Bellamy, author of the book "Looking Backward," known as the Bible of Nationalism. "


1890 (October) The Theosophist endorses Edward Bellamy, his book, and the Nationalist Party, and remarks about Theosophists being involved in the formation of the party and acting as its "most active and ardent workers and supporters." p 62. There is also a remark about "The Key to Theosophy" being translated into the German language (p. 61).

Theosophical writings of Annie Besant, Charles Leadbeater, and Helena Blavatsky, were translated and published in Germany. An 1892 periodical, Lotus Blossoms, featured Blavatsky's writings and "was the first German publication to sport the theosophical swastika upon its cover" (Goodrick-Clarke:25). As time went on numerous other Theosophy-based groups of occult socialism formed in Germany and Austria via Guido von List and Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels and Julius Streicher and others. Several of these groups would provide the philosophical framework for National Socialism in Germany.

Blavatsky praised Edward Bellamy's Nationalist Movement as "an application of Theosophy." Her support for Nationalism explains why many Theosophists, especially in the U.S.A. were active in that movement. She said "The organization of Society, depicted by Edward Bellamy, in his magnificent work Looking Backward, admirably represents the Theosophical idea of what should be the first great step towards the full realization of universal brotherhood."

Frightening facts about Nazism in America continue to be exposed by Professor Rex Curry. http://rexcurry.net/theosophy-madame-blavatsky-theosophical-society.html Dr. Curry showed that the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party originated from a National Socialist in America -Francis Bellamy- who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance in 1892. http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html Francis Bellamy promoted the National Socialism of his cousin Edward Bellamy, who was also promoted by the Theosophical Society and Madame Blavatsky.

The connection was so strong that to this day the Theosophical Society of America (TSA) has its Springfield Branch office at the Edward Bellamy House. Recent Theosophical Society lectures at the Edward Bellamy House included "Discovering the Secrets in the Akashic Records" and "Alchemical Art Therapy" and "Gnosis: An Ancient Path of Illumination." The address is 93 Church Street, Chicopee, MA and the Society's library is there, too.


Blavatsky praised "two English Socialist" members of the TS, (almost certainly Annie Besant being one and Herbert Burrows the other) as being exemplars to other Theosophists.

Albert Rawson and Charles Sotheran (sometimes spelled "Southeran") were both high-level masons and founding members in the TS. They encouraged a Masonic incorporation in the TS, and Blavatsky and Olcott remained open to that proposal from 1878 until after the TS had moved its operations to India. Sotheran was the Society’s first librarian. Charles Sotheran was an author, socialist, and a Supreme Council member of the Scottish Rite. As a friend of Blavatsky, Sotheran published a letter in her Isis Unveiled (2:388 -91), regarding Masonry and claiming a connection between America’s founding fathers and the Illuminati. Sotheran was author of "Horace Greeley and Other Pioneers of American Socialism" (The Radical Tradition in America Series).


Alice Bailey and husband Foster (32° degree mason) continued to interlock the workings of Theosophy with the aims of Freemasonry. Bailey, as founder of Lucis (Lucifer) Trust, worked laboriously to fulfill the plan toward a New World Religion, which her master Djwhal Khul had said was the ultimate aim of Freemasonry.


from the lucis trust website:
Teaching planned by the Hierarchy

The first in the series of three interpretations of the Ageless Wisdom teachings planned by the Hierarchy and entrusted to the Tibetan Master, was given to the world through H.P. Blavatsky between the years 1875 and 1890--fifteen years. This D.K. called the "preparatory" phase of the

teaching. The second was given over a thirty year period through Alice Bailey--from 1919 to 1949. The third and final aspect in the series will be given early next century by D.K. through a prepared initiate for, as he puts it, "this series of bridging treatises between the material knowledge of man and the science of the initiates has still another phase to run."

He also states categorically that the task of those who accept and endeavour to use the teaching creatively must be, for the remainder of this century, "dedicated to rebuilding the shrine of man's living, to re constructing the form of humanity's life, to reconstituting the new civilisation upon the foundation of the old, and to the reorganisation of the structures of world thought and world politics, plus the redistribution of the world's resources in conformity to divine purpose. Then, and only then, will it be possible to carry the revelation further."





i appreciate your open & patient dialogue.
considering the apparent relative measure of your awareness & your disdain for the illuminati & the new world order it is difficult for me to believe that your regard for theosophy remains intact, because there was a point at which it simply becomes impossible to argue that theosophy isn't in central collusion with the illuminati new world order. i mean it is insidious luciferianism the same as freemasonry is luciferianism striving for apotheosis & the "seething energies of lucifer", but while they both tend to make philosophical excuses for worshipping the antithesis of Christianity, blavatsky was a little more deliberate in equating satan & lucifer as one & the same.



are you also of the opinion that freemasonry isn't involved in establishing the new world order?



--
Freemasonry, through its mysteries, will soon usher in a New World Religion for the New World Order. A modern day Tower of Babel and the ultimate unification of the world's religions. The New Age welcomes these goals and looks to the "light" of Masonry as its esoteric basis for occult initiation into the New World Order. Benjamin Creme writes:

“The New Religion will manifest, for instance,through organizations like Masonry. In Freemasonry is embedded the core or the secret heart of the occult mysteries, wrapped up on number, metaphor and symbol ...”
- The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom, p.87

Freemason and co-founder of Lucifer Publishing Company (now called Lucis Trust), Foster Bailey, concurs, "Is it not possible from a contemplation of this side of Masonic teaching that it may provide all that is necessary for the formulation of a universal religion?"(The Spirit of Masonry, p.113) Foster Bailey states that Masonry "is the descendant of, or is founded upon, a divinely imparted religion..." This religion he explains, "...was the first United World Religion. Then came the era of separation of many religions and sectarianism. Today we are working again towards a World Universal Religion." (ibid p.31)

--
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/externalisation/exte1082.html

The Externalization of the Hierarchy - Section II - The General World Picture

Steps Towards the New World Order

In contradistinction to the totalitarian world order, what should the rest of the world plan? Towards what world objectives should the democracies work? Utopian schemes, idealistic forms of government and cultural living processes have ever been the playthings of the human mind, down through the centuries. But these Utopias have been so far ahead of possibility that their presentation seems useless. They are most of them wholly impractical.

Certain immediate possibilities and attainable objectives can, however, be worked out, given a definite will-to-good and patience on the part of humanity.

Certain major and spiritual premises should lie back of all efforts to formulate the new world order. Let me state some of them:
The new world order must meet the immediate need and not be an attempt to satisfy some distant, idealistic vision.
The new world order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience.
The new world order must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding.
The new world order will be founded on the recognition that all men are equal in origin and goal but that all are at differing stages of evolutionary development; that personal integrity, intelligence, vision and experience, plus a marked goodwill, should indicate leadership. The domination of the proletariat over the aristocracy and bourgeoisie, as in Russia, or the domination of an entrenched aristocracy over the proletariat and middle classes, as has been until lately the case in Great Britain, must disappear. The control of labor by capital or the control of capital by labor must also go. [191]
In the new world order, the governing body in any nation should be composed of those who work for the greatest good of the greatest number and who at the same time offer opportunity to all, seeing to it that the individual is left free. Today the men of vision are achieving recognition, thus making possible a right choice of leaders. It was not possible until this century.
The new world order will be founded on an active sense of responsibility. The rule will be "all for one and one for all." This attitude among nations will have to be developed. It is not yet present.
The new world order will not impose a uniform type of government, a synthetic religion and a system of standardization upon the nations. The sovereign rights of each nation will be recognized and its peculiar genius, individual trends and racial qualities will be permitted full expression. In one particular only should there be an attempt to produce unity, and that will be in the field of education.
The new world order will recognize that the produce of the world, the natural resources of the planet and its riches, belong to no one nation but should be shared by all. There will be no nations under the category "haves" and others under the opposite category. A fair and properly organized distribution of the wheat, the oil and the mineral wealth of the world will be developed, based upon the needs of each nation, upon its own internal resources and the requirements of its people. All this will be worked out in relation to the whole.
In the preparatory period for the new world order there will be a steady and regulated disarmament. It will not be optional. No nation will be permitted to produce and organize any equipment for destructive purposes or to infringe the security of any other nation. One of the first tasks of any future peace conference will be to regulate this matter and gradually see to the disarming of the nations. [192]

These are the simple and general premises upon which the new world order must begin its work. These preliminary stages must be kept fluid and experimental; the vision of possibility must never be lost, and the foundations must be preserved inviolate, but the intermediate processes and the experimentations must be carried forward by men who, having the best interests of the whole at heart, can change the detail of organization whilst preserving the life of the organism.